In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court of India, led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, has denounced the perpetuation of stereotypes against differently-abled individuals in visual media and films. This judicial pronouncement marks a significant step towards ensuring accurate and dignified representations of disabilities, challenging the prevalent narrative that often mocks or misrepresents these individuals.
Upholding Dignity: The Supreme Court’s Verdict
The Supreme Court, in its July 8 judgment, categorically criticized the use of derogatory terms like ‘cripple’ and ‘spastic’, which it argued contribute to the stigmatization of persons with disabilities. Justice J.B. Pardiwala hailed the judgment as “path-breaking”, emphasizing its role in safeguarding the dignity and identity of this marginalized community.
Chief Justice Chandrachud underscored how visual media often portrays disabled individuals through a lens of mockery and misconception. He highlighted the harmful impact of such portrayals, noting that they perpetuate myths about disabilities and undermine efforts towards inclusivity.
Focus on Representation: From Medical Model to Social Reality
The judgment also highlighted the shift from the medical model to the social model of disability. It emphasized that disabilities should not be viewed merely as personal tragedies but as social constructs influenced by inadequate representation and understanding.
Chief Justice Chandrachud pointed out the prevalence of stereotypes portraying disabled persons as possessing extraordinary abilities or as objects of pity. This skewed portrayal, termed as ‘super-cripples’, fails to represent the diverse realities of disabilities and reinforces harmful stereotypes.
Guidelines for Change: Redefining Discourse in Media
The Supreme Court issued comprehensive guidelines aimed at transforming the portrayal of disabilities in visual media and films. It stressed the importance of inclusive language that respects the dignity of persons with disabilities and refrains from marginalizing or dehumanizing them.
The guidelines advocate for the involvement of persons with disabilities in decision-making processes concerning their representation. They call for accurate depictions of medical conditions and emphasize showcasing the multifaceted aspects of disability, including their achievements and contributions to society.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s verdict represents a pivotal moment in the fight against discrimination towards differently-abled individuals in India. By challenging stereotypical portrayals and advocating for inclusive representations, the judiciary has taken a proactive stance in promoting societal acceptance and respect for diversity.
Key Learning Points
| Key Learning Points |
|---|
| Supreme Court denounces stereotypes in visual media and films. |
| Shift from medical to social model of disability emphasized. |
| Guidelines issued to promote inclusive representation of disabilities. |
Soumya Smruti Sahoo is a seasoned journalist with extensive experience in both international and Indian news writing. With a sharp analytical mind and a dedication to uncovering the truth, Soumya has built a reputation for delivering in-depth, well-researched articles that provide readers with a clear understanding of complex global and domestic issues. Her work reflects a deep commitment to journalistic integrity, making her a trusted source for accurate and insightful news coverage.
